When it's in the form of, say, deer munching on grass in the back yard, nature can be beautiful. Or birds flocking to the birdfeeder on a snowy day. But when it's in the form of rabbit portions on the living room carpet, nature can be not so beautiful. Yucky, even. I guess the partially-consumed bunny in question was the cats' Easter gift for us. Actually, Mario (one of our cream-colored Toms) seemed to regard it as
his gift. Like, are we not feeding him enough? Or what?
You'll have to take my word for this, since I didn't think photos were appropriate. We encountered the crime scene upon our return home late this afternoon--my first words: "Is that a rabbit?" Yup. A poor bunny minding his own business, unaware that he or she was entering a yard filled with scores of potential predators (though we believe only two carried out the killing--Mario and Whitey).
As far as I know, cats have no sense of irony, so we can assume Easter had nothing to do with their choice of what to drag in.
Meanwhile, the Box.net files that weren't working are now working. The usual now-they-work, now-they-don't routine. Box.net is doing its best to drive me insane, but good luck. They can try (hee, hee!), but they'll never (ho, ho!) succeed (ha, haaaa!). I'm (Buwa-ha-haaaa!) unbreakable in that regard.
So, please give a listen to
He Lives, Christ the Lord Is Risen Today, and my very own
Easter Chimes, on which I show off my ability to smoothly connect voices in four-part harmony. Because of occasional instances of two voices in unison, you'll hear some two- or three-part chords, but don't be alarmed. It's not your player. Or your ears.
"Wow! Listen to those smoothly-connected voices in four-part harmony!" raves the
New Internet Music Review.
I've been reading, and loving, Thomas Tapper's
First Year Harmony of 1938. It's beautifully written and laid out. The exciting chapters include "Melodic Intervals," "Harmonic Intervals," "Bases with Step-Wise Progression," "The Progression V-VI in Minor," and "Irregular Resolutions of the Seventh of the Dominant Seventh." A lot of it I already know; a lot of it I don't. Or don't know formally enough.
I recommend
First Year Harmony. You won't be able to put it down.
In other news, a First-Amendment-scholar columnist in our paper yesterday insists that viewers' rights are being affected by recent FCC rulings on indecency. Huh?? Sure, the right of a
TV network to show teen orgies might be affected, but I'm not a TV network, dude. Nor do I have any shows on ABC, CBS, Fox, cable, etc. So, how are
my F.A. rights being limited here? Even if CBS can't swear,
I can. I just said "Fuck" five times in a row. And the FCC ain't coming.
(Listening for sirens.) Nope. Ain't comin'.
Anyway, this is where the left becomes as power-protecting as the right. How dare anyone suggest, in neo-con fashion, that laws which affect the powerful affect
me, as a rule? Whether such assertions come from the left or right doesn't matter--it's the same ridiculous trickle-down fallacy. The shills screaming bloody murder over the recent FCC fines strike me as no different than those who assert that progressive taxation is unfair or who advocate Ohio-style corporate welfare. People are struggling to get by these days--yet, somehow, the bitching doesn't reach a loud dynamic until some rich person or entity has to follow a rule or two. Eternity will unfold unencumbered even if the networks aren't allowed to show tits. Life will go on. People will still cuss. And women will still have bosoms.
As far as I'm concerned, the FCC can fine away. Those losing sleep over the issue have my permission to get a life. Sure, the FCC could be more consistent in its judgments, and I'll concede that no one died from the sight of whatshername's nipple, but I still don't care. Fine away, FCC. If only to anger the shills further.
I was going to post a selection or two, but....
Right. Box.net is down. How did you guess????
Don't let looks fool you--this is Whitey, our unrepentant killer of birds and rabbits.
Lee